JAMA:药物治疗与减肥手术治疗2型糖尿病的长期疗效比较
本文由小咖机器人翻译整理
期刊来源:JAMA
原文链接:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.0318
摘要内容如下:
重要性
减肥手术的随机临床试验在规模、手术类型和随访时间方面受到限制。
目的
与2型糖尿病的药物/生活方式管理相比,确定减肥手术的长期血糖控制和安全性。
设计、设置和参与者
ARMMS-T2D(Alliance of Randomized Trials of Medicine vs Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes)是对2007年5月至2013年8月期间进行的4项美国单中心随机试验的汇总分析,观察性随访至2022年7月。
干预
参与者最初被随机分为两组,一组接受药物/生活方式管理,另一组接受以下3种减肥手术中的一种:Roux-en-Y胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术或可调节胃束带术。
主要成果和措施
主要结果是所有参与者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)从基线到7年的变化。数据报告长达12年。
结果
在305名符合条件的参与者中,共有262人(86%)参加了该汇总分析的长期随访。参与者的平均(SD)年龄为49.9(8.3)岁,平均(SD)身体质量指数为36.4(3.5),68.3%为女性,31%为黑人,67.2%为白人。在随访期间,随机接受药物/生活方式管理的参与者中有25%接受了减肥手术。中位随访时间为11年。7年时,医学/生活方式组的HbA1c从基线8.2%下降了0.2%(95%CI,-0.5%至0.2%),减肥手术组的HbA1c从基线8.7%下降了1.6%(95%CI,-1.8%至-1.3%)。组间差异为-1.4%(95%CI,-1.8%至-1.0%;P<.001)和-1.1%(95%CI,-1.7%至-0.5%;12岁时P=.002)。减肥手术组使用的抗糖尿病药物较少。减肥手术后糖尿病缓解率更高(药物/生活方式组为6.2%,减肥手术组为18.2%;P=0.02)(药物/生活方式组为0.0%,减肥手术组为12.7%;P<.001)。死亡4例(2.2%),每组各2例,主要心血管不良事件无差异。贫血、骨折和胃肠道不良事件在减肥手术后更为常见。
结论和相关性
经过7至12年的随访,与药物/生活方式干预相比,最初随机接受减肥手术的患者血糖控制更好,糖尿病药物使用更少,糖尿病缓解率更高。
试用注册
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02328599。
英文原文如下:
Abstracts
Importance Randomized clinical trials of bariatric surgery have been limited in size, type of surgical procedure, and follow-up duration.
Objective To determine long-term glycemic control and safety of bariatric surgery compared with medical/lifestyle management of type 2 diabetes.
Design, Setting, and Participants ARMMS-T2D (Alliance of Randomized Trials of Medicine vs Metabolic Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes) is a pooled analysis from 4 US single-center randomized trials conducted between May 2007 and August 2013, with observational follow-up through July 2022.
Intervention Participants were originally randomized to undergo either medical/lifestyle management or 1 of the following 3 bariatric surgical procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or adjustable gastric banding.
Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcome was change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to 7 years for all participants. Data are reported for up to 12 years.
Results A total of 262 of 305 eligible participants (86%) enrolled in long-term follow-up for this pooled analysis. The mean (SD) age of participants was 49.9 (8.3) years, mean (SD) body mass index was 36.4 (3.5), 68.3% were women, 31% were Black, and 67.2% were White. During follow-up, 25% of participants randomized to undergo medical/lifestyle management underwent bariatric surgery. The median follow-up was 11 years. At 7 years, HbA1c decreased by 0.2% (95% CI, -0.5% to 0.2%), from a baseline of 8.2%, in the medical/lifestyle group and by 1.6% (95% CI, -1.8% to -1.3%), from a baseline of 8.7%, in the bariatric surgery group. The between-group difference was -1.4% (95% CI, -1.8% to -1.0%; P < .001) at 7 years and -1.1% (95% CI, -1.7% to -0.5%; P = .002) at 12 years. Fewer antidiabetes medications were used in the bariatric surgery group. Diabetes remission was greater after bariatric surgery (6.2% in the medical/lifestyle group vs 18.2% in the bariatric surgery group; P = .02) at 7 years and at 12 years (0.0% in the medical/lifestyle group vs 12.7% in the bariatric surgery group; P < .001). There were 4 deaths (2.2%), 2 in each group, and no differences in major cardiovascular adverse events. Anemia, fractures, and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common after bariatric surgery.
Conclusion and Relevance After 7 to 12 years of follow-up, individuals originally randomized to undergo bariatric surgery compared with medical/lifestyle intervention had superior glycemic control with less diabetes medication use and higher rates of diabetes remission.
Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02328599.
-----------分割线---------
点击链接:https://www.mediecogroup.com/community/user/vip/categories/ ,成为医咖会员,获取12项专属权益。
