Ann Intern Med:体外冲击波碎石术和内镜治疗慢性胰腺炎疼痛的随机对照研究

2024-05-30 来源:Ann Intern Med

本文由小咖机器人翻译整理

期刊来源:Ann Intern Med

原文链接:https://doi.org/10.7326/M24-0210

摘要内容如下:

背景

尚无随机对照试验证实内镜下胰管减压术治疗疼痛性慢性胰腺炎。

客观

探讨胰管减压对慢性胰腺炎伴胰管内结石患者的止痛效果。

设计

24周,平行组,随机对照试验(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03966781)。

设置

2021年2月至2022年7月在印度的亚洲胃肠病研究所。

参与者

106例慢性胰腺炎患者。

干预

体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)联合内镜逆行胰管造影术(ERP)与假手术的比较。

测量

主要终点是12周时0-10分视觉模拟评分(VAS)的疼痛缓解。在12周和24周后评估次要结果,包括30%疼痛缓解、阿片类药物使用、无痛日、问卷调查和干预并发症。

结果

ESWL/ERP组52例,假手术组54例。在12周时,ESWL/ERP组显示出比假手术组更好的疼痛缓解(VAS的变化的平均差异,-0.7[95%CI,-1.3至0];P=0.039)。在24周的随访中,两组之间的差异没有持续,在12周或24周的随访中,30%的疼痛缓解没有差异。在12周的随访中,与假手术组相比,ESWL/ERP组的无疼痛天数增加(中位数差异,16.2天[CI,3.9至28.5天]),使用阿片类药物的天数减少(中位数差异,-5.4天[CI,-9.9至-0.9天])。两组的安全性结果相似。

局限性

单中心研究和有限的随访时间。

结论

在慢性胰腺炎和导管内结石患者中,ESWL联合ERP可适度缓解短期疼痛。

主要资金来源

亚洲胃肠病学研究所和奥尔堡大学医院。

英文原文如下:

Abstracts

BACKGROUND  No randomized controlled trials have substantiated endoscopic decompression of the pancreatic duct in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE  To investigate the pain-relieving effect of pancreatic duct decompression in patients with chronic pancreatitis and intraductal stones.

DESIGN  24-week, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03966781).

SETTING  Asian Institute of Gastroenterology in India from February 2021 to July 2022.

PARTICIPANTS  106 patients with chronic pancreatitis.

INTERVENTION  Combined extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) compared with sham procedures.

MEASUREMENTS  The primary end point was pain relief on a 0- to 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were assessed after 12 and 24 weeks and included 30% pain relief, opioid use, pain-free days, questionaries, and complications to interventions.

RESULTS  52 patients in the ESWL/ERP group and 54 in the sham group were included. At 12 weeks, the ESWL/ERP group showed better pain relief compared with the sham group (mean difference in change, -0.7 [95% CI, -1.3 to 0] on the VAS; P = 0.039). The difference between groups was not sustained at the 24-week follow-up, and no differences were seen for 30% pain relief at 12- or 24-week follow-up. The number of pain-free days was increased (median difference, 16.2 days [CI, 3.9 to 28.5 days]), and the number of days using opioids was reduced (median difference, -5.4 days [CI, -9.9 to -0.9 days]) in the ESWL/ERP group compared with the sham group at 12-week follow-up. Safety outcomes were similar between groups.

LIMITATION  Single-center study and limited duration of follow-up.

CONCLUSION  In patients with chronic pancreatitis and intraductal stones, ESWL with ERP provided modest short-term pain relief.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE  Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and Aalborg University Hospital.

-----------分割线---------

点击链接:https://www.mediecogroup.com/community/user/vip/categories/ ,成为医咖会员,获取12项专属权益。

评论
请先登录后再发表评论
发表评论
下载附件需认证
为保证平台的学术氛围,请先完成认证,认证可享受以下权益
基础课程券2张
200积分
确认
取消
APP下载 领课程券
扫码下载APP
领基础课程券
公众号
统计咨询
扫一扫添加小咖个人微信,立即咨询统计分析服务!
会员服务
SCI-AI工具
积分商城
意见反馈